As investors have learned, like any other investment, cryptocurrency is
subject to volatility. The recent bankruptcy filing of crypto exchange
FTX shows, this volatility can be extreme. For example, the Ontario
Teachers' Pension plan wrote down $95 million
due to the collapse. As you probably know, bankruptcy occurs when
liabilities are greater than assets. However, bankruptcy can result from
a finer distinction between liabilities and assets, namely liquidity.
In the case of FTX, the company had $8.9 billion in liabilities and $9.6
billion in assets. So was the company forced to declare bankruptcy?
Liquidity. When you look at the balance sheet,
FTX had $900 million in liquid assets, $5.5 billion in less-liquid
assets, and $3.2 billion in illiquid assets. Think about it like way:
You owe $10,000 at the end of the week but your only asset is a $100,000
house. Yes, your assets are greater than liabilities, but you likely
won't be able to sell the house and receive the cash for the sale by the
end of the week, so you could be forced into bankruptcy. But FTX had
other problems as well. John Ray, who was appointed to oversee the FTX
bankruptcy and has overseen other large bankruptcies such as Enron, stated "Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate
controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial
information as occurred here."
Monday, November 21, 2022
Liquidity and Bankruptcy
Tuesday, June 28, 2022
Inventory Spikes
During 2021, much of the talk concerning inventory surrounded shortages due to a variety of factors. In response, many companies increased production and orders to combat supply chain disruptions and increased consumer demand coming out of COVID-19 lockdowns. Now, it appears that companies have overshot demand as inventories have surged. For example, inventories for global manufacturing companies reached a record $1.87 trillion. As a result, inventory turnover for manufacturers increased to 81.1 days. And retailers are no different: Inventory for Macy's, Target, Walmart and other large retailers has increased from 17 to 45 percent compared to last year. This increased inventory is a boon for off-price retailers like Ross and TJ Maxx, which have a larger supply from big retailers offloading excess inventory. For many corporations, the excess inventory will likely negatively impact the bottom line.
Thursday, July 9, 2020
Kia's Home Run
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Total Cost To Reward And Retain Employees
Sunday, July 7, 2019
McDonald's Negative McEquity
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
The (Partial) Effects Of Tax Reform
Thursday, June 9, 2016
PE Ratio Math
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Ratios And Lease Accounting
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Inventory Shortage Costs
Saturday, February 7, 2015
Russell 2000 Facts And Figures
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Months' Payables Oustanding
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Capital Expenditures Slow
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
GE's Profit Rises On Negative Taxes
Friday, November 22, 2013
Exxon's Performance
Thursday, October 3, 2013
#TwitterIPO
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Notes Payable: Operating Or Financing Cash Flows?
A common question posed to us is the treatment of notes payable. Are notes payable part of total debt, or is it something else? You should note that there is an unavoidable inconsistency in dealing with notes payable and cash flow from assets. The same thing occurs when calculate EFN. In both contexts, NWC is essentially treated as an asset, which means that notes payable have been netted out (treated as a contra-asset). On the other hand, interest paid shows up in cash flow to creditors, but not repayments of note principal (which show up in the change in NWC). Interestingly, a similar inconsistency shows up in the standard statement of cash flows, where interest paid is treated as an operating cost.